focalintent: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] contessagrrl and I played with a red dress, a red couch, and a camera while she and family were out here visiting last week. This is one of my favorite shots of the set, I think:



There's others, just waiting to get them uploaded/ok'd before sharing - but, like mentioning above, this is one of my favorite ones.
focalintent: (Default)
I just recently got the canon 24-105mm f/4L IS lens. I've only had it for a few days, and I already love it. It's not that much heavier than my 28-70mm f/2.8 lens was - but it's L glass and has IS. I love the IS. I want to continue to do more shooting with it, but I think my camera has a new 'permanent attachment'. To be honest, there never really was much doubt for me as to what was going to become my next normal lens - having rented the 24-105mm f/4L IS in the past, as well as the 24-70mm f/2.8L, and owning a 28-70mm f/2.8 (tokina) and playing a little bit with the 28-135mm consumer IS lens.

There's two more lenses that I want to get to complete my troika of 'primary lenses'. The first is the 16-35mm f/2.8L. I love its low light handling and the very wide angle and fairly short minimum focus distance (11 inches) makes it great for things like club photography, which I really want to get back into. I don't think i'll be buying this lens till the summer - but I can readily get it to rent when I need/want it, so that's good.

The third lens that I want to complete my set is a good 'long' lens. I've written multiple times about my lens thoughts and now things are coming down to the wire. I've narrowed down the field to two lenses. The first is canon's 70-200mm f/4L IS lens. I've rented and borrowed the 70-200mm f/4L before in the past - and there's a lot that I love about that lens. It's a light lens - not much heavier than the 24-105mm f/4L IS - in fact with the handstrap on my camera, i can easily aim/shoot single handed with that lens - and can definitely comfortably carry it around for hours off the handstrap.

The only downside to it is that 200mm is actually not very long, especially on a full frame sensor like i've got on the 5d. To counter that I could always get an extender. The 1.4x extender would turn it into a 98-280mm f/5.6L lens. The 2x extender would turn it into a 140-400mm f/8L lens. Of course, you'll note that the extenders drop the maximum aperture of the lens (and I believe with the 5d, an f/8 maximum aperture means the auto focus mechanism will no longer function). Then there's the fact that I would need to regularly swap the extender in and out. On the flip side - how frequently will I want the longer range?

The other lens that is a strong contender is the 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS lens. Yes, it's a slower lens than the 70-200mm out of the gate - but at 400mm it's faster than the 70-200mm with a 2x extender. It's a bit of a beast though, at nearly twice the weight/volume than the 70-200mm. Also, while the 70-200mm has intenral zooming (length doesn't change as you zoom) the 100-400mm extends as it zooms, and at 400mm it extends nearly 40% further off the front of the camera.

So, to help making the final decision I am actually currently renting both lenses - they showed up this morning. There is a slim chance I may extend my rental to take one (or possibly both, even?) of these lenses with me to costa rica in march. The cost of the rental is worth it to me to make sure that I buy the Right Lens[tm] when I do.

First impressions? My reactions to the lenses based on sizes/past experiences is pretty right on. The 70-200mm I can have on 5d and still comfortably handle the camera one handed. While i'm sure a full day of it would lend to some level of fatigue, i'm sure combining it with a next strap and/or time in the camera bag when not actively shooting would counter that.

The 100-400mm, however, is even more of a monster than i thought. At 100mm it still feels longer than the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS lens and it is heavy. While I can pick up the 5d one handed with this lens I almost immediately feel the tension on my wrist. This is definitely a double handed lens/camera combination. Ths IS makes it possible to handhold for sharp shots though - with some stupid test shots around the apartment (sometimes 20 minute full rebuild times aren't a bad thing) I'm impressed that I can shoot at 400mm with 1/200s or even 1/100s handheld and still get sharp results. Thank you Canon Engineering!

That said - I love the range of the lens. And with the push/pull design of the zoom - I can very quickly go from 100-400mm. Combined with using a separate focus lock button, and the fact that it maintains focus on a selected distance no matter how I adjust the zoom, and the mode 2 panning support for IS I think this could be a great lens to shoot things like, say, surfers.

But damn, is it a beast. I'm even dreading the thought of having this sitting in my camera bag while i'm using the 24-105mm on the 5d - and I'm not sure I would want to just let the camera/lens hang around my neck with a neck strap, i'd want to always be actively supporting it at least. And there's no such thing as inconspicuous with it.

I hope to get a lot of time/shooting in with both of these lenses over the next few weeks, alternating regularly between the two of them. At the end of the day, I think my decision is going to come down to whether or not I can comfortably use the 100-400mm as a walking around lens. Time will tell on that one.

Right now, I have a feeling that I'm going to end up opting for the 70-200mm with a 1.4x extender kept in the camera bag. Then, if I find myself regularly wanting to have the 400mm reach (say, if i start regularly shooting sports/surfers) then possibly consider either renting the 100-400mm as needed, or maybe snag the 400mm f/5.6L, which by some accounts is a shaper lens - though, if I do that, then it might be worth it to get the 100-400mm as a second long lens, as for $300 more than the 400mm f/5.6L i would get a 100-399mm zoom range -and- IS. Not sure I want to deal with two long lenses, though. On the flip side, one thing I like is having my camera bag always on me and ready for things I might want to shoot - and if the 100-400mm lens is too big to comfortably keep in there, then it may not be worth having.

Yay for lots of rambling, eh?
focalintent: (Default)
Originally posted in a comment - this is a 110 dpi version of a negative off of the 645. If I hold the negative up to the monitor it is almost exactly this size (if not exactly):





Of course - whether or not it's the right size on your display depends on where between 72 and 150dpi your display is : )

first film

Jan. 29th, 2007 06:18 pm
focalintent: (Default)
So, I got my first roll of film back with the medium format camera. I wouldn't say I was ecstatic about the shots. And I'm sure the 5x7 print size has left something to be desired.

But OMG - the negatives are... amazing. I can actually see an incredible amount of detail in them. I wish I had a negative scanner to be able to show them off. Alas, the crappy brother mfc-210c that is my only scanner at the moment does a really bad job with them. I know, I just tried to scan a strip of the film.

So - the best I can do, until I get a scanner that's better capable of handling film[1] is to scan the 5x7 prints that I got. Of course, see comment above about crappy scanner - 600x600 dpi is the best i can scan at, and the banding that i get is driving me up a wall. But for now, it's my best option for sharing these images out.

and now, the images themselves )

[1] I'm seriously tempted by the Epson v700 - as its film scans apparently approach $2000 dedicated film scanners in quality (sometimes surpassing them) and I don't see myself dropping $18k on a drum scanner anytime soon (if I'm going to drop that kind of money, i'd say fuck it and get myself digital backs). In the meantime, I should find a good place to send 120 strips off to for scanning)
focalintent: (Default)
Break glass )

photospasm

Oct. 30th, 2006 10:48 am
focalintent: (Default)
It's been pointed out to me that it's been a while since i've posted anything picturewise. Which I realized is true - but this doesn't mean that I haven't been wandering around with the camera. Why, just in the past month I have:



The gallery solution is temporary - I need to get something better going, but Lightroom's output options are limited (and I don't want to have to deal with separately uploading to/managing a gallery - ideally, someone will come up with a good lightroom->(menalto) gallery plugin soon : )

lens spew

Oct. 23rd, 2006 12:41 pm
focalintent: (Default)
well, not really a spew. I have a longer post regarding my thoughts on long term lens purchase plans, as well as an idea of 'tiers' of lenses or rounds of purchases, and where I'm at in that, and what my plan is with it (assuming the photography keeps moving forward). But work is hell and so today i'm just tossing out a simple brain dump/question.

I need a new long lens. The 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM III has served me ... ok for the time i've had it, though the full frame of the 5d is brutal on the lens quality and the fact that the front lens element rotates when focusing drives me batshit (circular polarize, what?). So, i'm looking to step up.

In an ideal world, i'd probably be getting a 70-200mm f/2.8L IS with either a 1.6x or 2.0x extender to keep in the bag for that extra reach. Alas, i'd also be looking at $1800 in purchases to do that. Not quite the money there right now (and, i'm not sure that's what i'd want to spend it on if i had $1800 lying around, even - but that's part of the later tiered lenses post).

I think my budget is hovering somewhere around $500, give or take - which narrows my field down to three lenses of interest:


  • Tokina AT-X 840AF-II 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 - the cheapest of the bunch, it is also the slowest (f/4.5-5.6) the lowest rated (but still respectably so), and the heaviest of the options. Gear based focusing (e.g. not USM/HSM) and an ass long minimum focusing distance (2.5m).
  • Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM - this is roughly the same price as the other lens on my list. It also has a middle reach in terms of range, and is also faster than the tokina, but slower than the other canon below. It seems to be rated as one of canon's highest quality non-L long zoom lenses, and the addition of IS can help make up for the slow. A 1.5m minimum focusing distance is also nicer than the tokina's 2.5m. Alas, like the 75-300mm lens i'm looking to replace, the front element rotates while focusing. (I believe the tokina doesn't, and I know the next lens doesn't).
  • Canon 70-200mm f/4L USM. - i've shot with this lens before. It's a nice lens. Lightweight, best minimum focus distance (1.2m) of this set of lenses - also the fastest with a constant f/4 aperture. Alas, it's also the shortest range of the lenses in this group.


Of course, if I want to double my price, my lens options go up to a sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 that's supposed to be phenomenal qualitywise, or a sigma 80-400mm that adds image stabalization (and higher image quality over the tokina 80-400mm), or a 100-300mm f/4 from sigma which is getting some really great reviews, or I can go for insane reach with a 50-500mm lens, that is insanely slow (and probably the least likely lens that I would get). I'm not sure that I want to double my price range at the moment though.

If money were no object, i'd probably be chosing between the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS or the 70-200mm f/4L IS (why would I consider an F4 vs. F2.8 all else being equal? Weight/size. The 2.8L is a monster of a lens, and the 2.8L IS is even moreso). The 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS might be another option, but the push/pull zoom was awkward the one time i played with it (albiet briefly, in a store for a few minutes) - ditto for the 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS (also push pull, and normally I wouldn't consider such a long range lens - but at the level of quality of this one... I should try renting one some day - but at $2200 - it's so far out of budget it's not even funny).

So, now, the poll:

[Poll #851398]

Meme time!

Jun. 28th, 2006 03:23 pm
focalintent: (Default)
Stolen from [livejournal.com profile] astarte93 : )

Ask me to take a picture of any aspect of my life that you're interested in/curious about. Leave your choice here as a comment and I will do the picture(s) and post them in separate LJ entries as I do them.

As an added bonus question - toss in a secondary 'assignment' if you wish for something to shoot.

Edit: and just because i like tossing things out there - anonymous comments/requests are screened - do with that knowledge what you will...

Wine

Jun. 24th, 2006 12:54 am
focalintent: (Default)


Repeated exposures and printings and re-framings - 10 in all.


color commentary under here )
focalintent: (Default)


Canon 5D, 28mm f/11 iso 400
full size here
focalintent: (Default)
The other day I brought you The Hot[tm]. Tonight, dear readers, I present to you, The Cute[tm]:

cut for the weak of heart )
focalintent: (Default)
Shots from the seattle - bainbridge island ferry


5 more )
focalintent: (Default)
Life )

Wood )

Stone )

Metal )
focalintent: (Default)
The bay bridge and yahoo )
focalintent: (Default)
City Lights to guide me in my sleep )

Profile

focalintent: (Default)
focalintent

July 2014

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 30th, 2025 03:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios