Date: 2006-03-16 08:27 pm (UTC)
Yeah the full frame / resolution is certainly demanding on the lenses. I forgot - didn't you have that 50mm prime or were you just talking about possibly getting that? I bet that would make for some really sharp images. I'm thinking of getting the USM version... mainly for it's 1.4 aperture.. I've been really into shallow dof lately. Mmmm... :)


That Tokina does look pretty decent. I have somewhat of the same feelings about Tokina and Tamron that you do about Sigma, but just because the few lenses I've been exposed to by them were pretty cruddy. I think they all make lenses ranging from crappy to great. Even Canon.

I think it depends on the specific lenses really though. Some companies have really gotten some lenses perfected while some of their others even in the same price range just don't hold up. I've got two sigmas (the 17-35 and the 105mm 2.8 Macro - both EX series) and they've both been great to me. As I've said before, the 17-35mm is not the sharpest but I've gotten many great shots with it regardless. The 105mm is SUPER sharp. It's a great lens (except the autofocus mechanism is a joke and mostly useless. Haha)

Don't be afraid of the cleaning!!! Just get the Eclipse fluid and the Type 3 Sensor Swabs. It used to be a lot scarier when people had to craft their own devices for this but with these things it's really easy and quick. I have been using them for quite a while and have not had any problems.

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

focalintent: (Default)
focalintent

July 2014

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 06:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios